Need testing support? Check our Quality Assurance services.

See also

Let’s discuss your project

“If intelligence is a cake, the bulk of the cake is unsupervised learning, the icing on the cake is supervised learning, and the cherry on the cake is reinforcement learning.”

— Yann LeCun, NIPS 2016 Keynote | Source

Have questions or need support? Contact us – our experts are happy to help.

In the business landscape of 2025, artificial intelligence has ceased to be a futuristic curiosity and has become one of the most powerful drivers of value and innovation. From personalizing customer experiences in e-commerce to predictive analytics in finance to supply chain optimization in industry, the ability to effectively build and deploy AI systems is becoming a key driver of competitive advantage. However, deciding to invest in AI is only the beginning of the journey. Immediately following is the fundamental question that technology leaders around the world are asking: on what technological foundation should we build? What programming language should we use?

This question is much more complex than it might seem. In the world of AI, choosing a programming language is not a matter of developers’ personal preference or a fad. It’s a deeply strategic decision to invest in the entire ecosystem - in libraries, tools, community and, most importantly, in access to the talent market. A wrong decision at this stage can lead to a solution that is slow, difficult to maintain and impossible to scale. In this comprehensive guide, prepared by ARDURA Consulting strategists and architects, we will examine the key programming languages used in AI from the perspective of a business leader. We’ll show you the forces behind the dominance of certain technologies and how to make informed choices that will make your AI investment a powerful and sustainable asset.

Why, in the world of AI, when we say “programming language” we actually think of the entire ecosystem

Before delving into individual technologies, we need to establish one key principle: in the context of artificial intelligence, the programming language itself - its syntax, keywords, structure - is probably the least important piece of the puzzle. The real value and strength of a technology lies in its ecosystem. It determines how quickly, efficiently and securely advanced solutions can be built.

This ecosystem consists of four pillars. The first and most important are libraries and frameworks - ready-made, optimized toolkits for performing specific tasks, from manipulating data to building complex neural networks. The second pillar is community and support. An active, global community means access to thousands of tutorials, discussion forums and ready-made solutions to common problems. The third, critical from a business perspective, is the talent pool. A popular ecosystem means there are more qualified professionals on the market, making recruitment easier and faster. The fourth pillar is the **quality of tools and integratio ** - how easy it is to deploy, test and monitor solutions built with a given technology, and how well they integrate with the rest of the company’s infrastructure. Keeping this perspective in mind, the analysis of individual languages becomes much clearer and more strategic.

Python: How did simplicity and powerful libraries make it the undisputed king of artificial intelligence?

There is only one ruler in the realm of artificial intelligence, and his name is Python. Its dominance is so overwhelming that for most new AI projects in 2025, choosing any other technology would require a very strong and unusual justification. Interestingly, Python was not designed with AI in mind. Its strength came from its philosophy of simplicity and readability, which attracted the scientific community to it.

Python has become an ideal “lab table” for data scientists and AI researchers. It allowed them to quickly prototype and test complex ideas without having to struggle with complex syntax. This popularity led to the creation of the world’s richest ecosystem of AI-dedicated libraries. Today, the foundation of virtually every project is a powerful set of tools:

  • NumPy and Pandas: the basis for all data operations, from simple calculations to advanced manipulation.

  • Scikit-learn: An indispensable workhorse for classical machine learning.

  • TensorFlow, PyTorch and Keras: the giants on which the entire world of deep learning (deep learning) is based.

  • Hugging Face Transformers and LangChain: Libraries that have democratized access to large language models (LLMs) and become the standard for building applications based on generative AI.

From a business leader’s perspective, choosing Python is the lowest-risk decision and the fastest way to get results. The access to talent, the maturity of the tools and the support of the community are simply unbeatable.

R: What makes the language created by statisticians still a powerful tool in the analytics niche?

Before Python dominated the scene, the language of first choice in the world of data science was R. Created by statisticians for statisticians, R is an extremely powerful and specialized tool that still remains irreplaceable in certain niches. Its strength lies not in building complex production systems, but in **deep, interactive data analysis and advanced visualizatio **.

The R ecosystem, centered around the CRAN repository, offers the world’s most comprehensive collection of packages for advanced statistical testing, econometric modeling and scientific research. The ggplot2 library is considered the gold standard for creating elegant and informative data visualizations. In practice, R is like a surgeon’s precision scalpel - ideal for conducting very specific, in-depth analyses.

In a modern company’s technology strategy, R often plays a complementary role to Python. It can be used by research teams or business analysts for exploratory data analysis and creating detailed reports, which then become the basis for building production AI models already in Python. It’s a tool for specialists that, in the right hands, can deliver unique, deep insights.

C++: When is performance so critical that you need direct access to “metal”?

Although AI models are almost always created and trained in high-level languages such as Python, there is a world where every nanosecond and every watt of energy counts. This is the world of production deployment (inference) of models in environments with extreme performance requirements. And this is where C++ comes into play.

Almost all deep learning frameworks, such as TensorFlow and PyTorch, have their computational kernels written right in C++. Python serves only as a convenient, high-level interface to manage this powerful engine. Once the model is trained, it can often be exported and run in a native, highly optimized C++ environment.

This approach is absolutely key in several business scenarios. The first is Edge AI, which is running models directly on end devices such as smartphones, industrial cameras, autonomous cars or IoT sensors. In these settings, performance and low power consumption are critical. The second is the world of high-frequency finance and trading, where fractions of a second in model response time can determine millions of dollars in profits. The third is robotics and real-time video processing. For a technology leader, this means that a complete AI strategy must take into account not only the research and development stage in Python, but also the potential need for C++ competence for final, production implementation.

Java and Scala: How Big Data languages have become the foundation for enterprise-scale AI systems

Artificial intelligence systems are extremely “hungry” for data. Before any model can be trained, data must be collected, cleaned, processed and structured - often on the scale of petabytes. The world that deals with processing such huge volumes of data, the world of Big Data, has been dominated for years by technologies running on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM).

Tools such as Apache Hadoop, Apache Kafka and, most importantly, Apache Spark, which are the standard in data engineering today, are built on JVM. Java, with its maturity, stability and performance, is the foundation of data infrastructure in thousands of the world’s largest corporations. Scala, a more modern, functional language that runs on the JVM, has in turn become the preferred language for writing complex data processing pipelines in Apache Spark.

From an architectural perspective, AI systems in many large organizations are structured in a hybrid fashion. Powerful, reliable data pipelines (data pipelines) written in Java or Scala prepare data, which is then consumed by model-training processes written in Python. Understanding this synergy is key. Building a successful AI strategy in a large company often requires competence in both the Python and JVM ecosystems.

Julia: Does this “young contender” have a chance to dethrone Python in science and analytics?

For several years, an interesting and ambitious contender for the throne in the world of scientific computing - the Julia language - has been on the horizon. Its creators have set themselves the goal of solving the so-called “two-language problem” that has long plagued the scientific world. It consists in the fact that scientists first prototype their ideas in an easy and slow language (like Python or R), and then, in order to get the required performance, they have to rewrite all the code into a fast but complex language (like C++).

Julia is designed to offer the best of both worlds: a simple and intuitive syntax, similar to Python, while offering performance comparable to compiled languages such as C. In fields requiring extremely intensive numerical computation, such as physical simulations, climate modeling or analytics in quantitative finance, Julia is gaining recognition.

As of today, in 2025, the Julia ecosystem is still much smaller and less mature than that of Python. For a technology leader, this means that Julia is not yet ready to become the main language for universal AI projects. However, it is a technology to watch closely. For very specific, niche computing problems, implementing a Proof of Concept project in it could prove to be an extremely apt and innovative decision.

Lisp: Why is the “granddaddy language” of artificial intelligence still worth mentioning?

Mentioning Lisp in the context of modern AI languages may seem like an anachronism. However, it is a respect for history and an understanding of the fundamental concepts that have shaped the entire field. Lisp, created in 1958, was one of the first programming languages and for decades was the dominant language in artificial intelligence research.

It was in Lisp that the first expert systems, natural language processing programs and many fundamental algorithms were created. Its unique philosophy, in which code is treated the same as data (homoiconicity), made it possible to create extremely flexible and self-modifying programs. Although today Lisp is no longer used in mainstream machine learning, its legacy is still alive. Many of the concepts born in the Lisp ecosystem have inspired developers of modern languages, including Python. Having a technology partner like ARDURA Consulting understand these roots is a sign of deep knowledge that goes beyond familiarity with the latest trendy frameworks.

How does the language affect MLOps strategy and the cost of maintaining an AI system in the long term?

The implementation of an AI model is not the end, but the beginning of its life cycle. Long-term success and return on investment depend on the ability to effectively maintain, monitor and update the system in production. This area, known as MLOps (Machine Learning Operations), is strongly linked to the choice of the original ecosystem.

The **Pytho ** ecosystem has by far the richest and most mature set of MLOps tools. Platforms such as MLflow, Kubeflow or dedicated cloud services (e.g. Amazon SageMaker, Google Vertex AI) are best integrated precisely with Python. This makes it easier to build automated pipelines to retrain models, monitor their performance and manage their lifecycle, which reduces maintenance costs in the long run.

Implementing and monitoring models written in C++ is much more complex and requires having highly specialized engineers on the team with skills at the intersection of DevOps and software engineering. In contrast, using the JVM (Java/Scala) ecosystem for the data preparation stage, while extremely efficient, also requires integration and maintenance of a separate technology stack. Therefore, when deciding on a language, a technology leader needs to think not only about the cost and time of the initial development, but also the total cost of ownership (TCO) over a 3-5 year horizon.

How do we at ARDURA Consulting select technology to make your AI project doomed to success?

At ARDURA Consulting, we take a pragmatic and technology agnostic approach to technology selection. We are not tied to one language or framework. We are tied to one goal: our client’s business success. That’s why our technology recommendation process is always preceded by an in-depth strategic analysis.

We believe in a “polyglot” approach, meaning that modern, complex AI systems are rarely written in a single language. We often design architectures where different components are written in the technology best suited to their task. This could be a system where a powerful data pipeline in Scala (Spark) processes data, which is then used to train a model in Python (PyTorch), and the final, optimized model is served as a high-performance service in C++.

Our process begins with a strategy workshop, where we define the business problem and key metrics for success. We then conduct a data assessment and feasibility study, often in the form of a quick Proof of Concept in Python, to verify the potential of the idea. Only on this basis do we design the target architecture, selecting the optimal set of languages and tools. This methodology allows us to make decisions based on data and real needs, rather than technological dogmatism.

So what is the final verdict, and which AI language should you use in your next project?

After this detailed analysis, the verdict, although complex, becomes clear. There is no single “best” programming language for artificial intelligence. Instead, there is a clear leader, the default choice for most applications, and a set of powerful, specialized tools for special tasks.

  • For research, development, prototyping and building most AI systems, **Pytho ** is the default, safest and most efficient choice. Its ecosystem is simply too powerful to ignore.

  • When the goal is to implement the model in an environment with the absolute highest performance requirements (Edge AI, real-time systems), the strategy should be supplemented with components in C++.

  • When building large-scale industrial processing pipelines, the JVM (Java/Scala) ecosystem plays a key role.

  • For deep, specialized statistical analysis and research, R remains an extremely valuable tool.

The smartest strategy is not to choose a single language, but to build a competency and architecture that allows you to intelligently leverage the strengths of the entire, diverse AI ecosystem. And the most effective way to achieve this is to work with a partner who not only knows these tools, but more importantly understands how and when to use them to bring maximum business value.