Need IT specialists? Check our Body Leasing services.

Read also: Offshore vs Nearshore vs Onshore 2026: Which Outsourcing Mod

Let’s discuss your project

Have questions or need support? Contact us – our experts are happy to help.

In the dynamic world of modern forms of employment, body leasing has become one of the key models for acquiring IT professionals. However, along with the flexibility and efficiency that this solution offers, complex questions arise regarding the responsibilities of the various parties. Who is actually responsible for the employee? What are the responsibilities of the providing company and those of the using company? Where is the line of liability in the event of damages or breaches of confidentiality?

In this comprehensive guide, we examine all key aspects of liability in the body leasing model. Drawing on years of market experience and current business practices, we provide a comprehensive look at legal, operational and practical issues. From basic health and safety issues to personal data management to complex copyright and non-compete aspects, each area is covered in detail from the perspective of all parties involved.

Whether you represent a company that provides employees or uses body leasing, you will find specific answers to key questions and practical tips for implementation. This guide will help you understand and effectively manage your responsibilities in the body leasing model, minimizing the risks and maximizing the benefits of this form of cooperation.

Who is legally responsible for the employee in the body leasing model?

In the body leasing model, there is a distinctive triangle of responsibility in which each party has clearly defined duties and legal responsibilities. The company providing the employee (lessor) remains the employee’s formal employer and has primary legal responsibility under the Labor Code. This includes, among other things, payment of wages, payment of social security contributions and provision of basic employee benefits.

The benefiting company (lessee), on the other hand, assumes operational responsibility for the employee in terms of organizing and supervising his work. This means that it is responsible for assigning tasks, controlling their performance and ensuring appropriate working conditions. It is worth emphasizing that this responsibility is factual and not formal from a labor law perspective.

An employee in this arrangement is subject to dual subordination - he or she reports to the benefiting company on a business basis, but formally remains employed by the providing company. This dual structure requires a precise definition of responsibilities in the body leasing contract to avoid potential misunderstandings and conflicts of competence.

Practice shows that the most effective solution is to describe the division of responsibilities in detail in a tripartite agreement that takes into account the specifics of the project and industry. This allows the cooperation model to be flexibly adapted to specific business needs while maintaining a clear legal framework.

How is the liability demarcated between the sharing company and the using company?

The demarcation of responsibilities between companies in the body leasing model is based on the principle of functional separation of powers. The providing company bears full responsibility for all formal and legal aspects of the employment relationship, including HR, payroll, insurance and employee social security issues.

The benefiting company, in turn, assumes responsibility for the organization of work, its quality and results. In practice, this means that it is responsible for introducing the employee to the project, providing him with the necessary tools and access, and managing his work on an ongoing basis. This side of the cooperation also includes responsibility for the compliance of the tasks performed with project requirements and quality standards.

A key element is the precise definition of communication procedures between the two companies. This is especially true in situations that require a quick response, such as employee performance problems or the need to make changes to an employee’s duties. An efficient flow of information allows for effective management of potential risks and rapid response to emerging challenges.

In business practice, the model in which the benefiting company has direct influence on the daily work of the seconded specialist, while the providing company provides professional development support and takes care of the formal aspects of employment, works well. Such a division allows optimal use of the competencies of both organizations.

Is the sharing company responsible for the results of the delegated employees?

The issue of responsibility for the results of body leasing work requires particularly precise regulation in the contract. Normally, the providing company is not directly responsible for the specific results of the delegated employee, but is responsible for providing a specialist with the competencies and experience specified in the contract.

In practice, this means that the leasing company guarantees that the delegated employee has the declared skills and qualifications, while the beneficiary company is already responsible for the effective use of these competencies. This is a logical consequence of the fact that it is the beneficiary company that directly supervises the work and determines the specific goals to be achieved.

It is worth noting, however, that clauses on labor quality guarantees are increasingly appearing in body leases. The providing company can undertake to replace an employee if his work does not meet the agreed quality standards. Such an arrangement provides an additional safeguard for the beneficiary company and motivates the leasing company to carefully select candidates.

The best practice is to introduce periodic performance reviews, during which the two companies jointly assess the quality of cooperation and make necessary adjustments if necessary. This allows for ongoing monitoring of results and quick response to any problems.

What liability does the benefiting company have to the seconded employee?

A company using an employee in a body leasing model is primarily responsible for the organizational aspects of the employee’s work. This includes ensuring an appropriate workstation, access to the necessary tools and systems, as well as a proper introduction to the team and project. This responsibility is practical and directly affects the effectiveness of the collaboration.

Ensuring a safe and compliant work environment is also an important area of responsibility. The leasing company must adhere to working time norms, provide adequate breaks and take care of the ergonomics of the workplace. Although the formal employer remains the leasing company, it is the beneficiary company that is responsible for the daily conditions under which duties are performed.

Another key aspect is the responsibility to properly delegate tasks and manage the work of the delegated specialist. The beneficiary company should clearly communicate its expectations, provide appropriate guidance and feedback, and monitor the progress of the delegated tasks. This is particularly important in the context of effective use of the employee’s competencies.

Business practice shows that the best results are achieved by companies that treat seconded employees on an equal footing with their own staff in terms of access to project training, team meetings or team-building events. This approach fosters commitment and translates into higher productivity.

Who is responsible for the health and safety of a seconded employee?

Responsibility for health and safety in the body leasing model is shared, but with a clear delineation of responsibilities. The sharing company, as the formal employer, is responsible for basic health and safety training, medical examinations and record keeping in this regard.

The beneficiary company, on the other hand, is responsible for the practical aspects of health and safety at the workplace. This includes ensuring safe working conditions, adhering to working time standards, and conducting job training that takes into account the specifics of the particular work environment. This is a logical consequence of actually performing work in a space controlled by the beneficiary company.

It is particularly important to clearly define procedures for workplace accidents. In practice, the user company should immediately inform the sharing company of any incidents that may affect employee safety. Cooperation in documenting and clarifying such situations is key to properly safeguarding the interests of all parties.

It is also good practice to conduct regular health and safety audits with representatives from both companies. This allows for ongoing identification of potential hazards and taking preventive measures.

What is the responsibility for equipment and tools entrusted to an employee?

The issue of responsibility for equipment and tools in body leasing requires particularly precise regulation in the cooperation agreement. Normally, the beneficiary company is responsible for providing and maintaining the tools necessary to perform the work, including computer hardware, software and other technical resources. This is a natural consequence of the fact that it determines the technical requirements and work standards.

Different models of equipment management have developed in business practice. Some user companies prefer to provide their own equipment, which ensures full control over security and technical standards. Others accept the possibility of using equipment provided by the leasing company, provided certain technical and security requirements are met.

Liability for damage to entrusted equipment also needs to be clearly regulated. Normally, an employee is liable for damage caused through his or her fault, but the sharing company, as the formal employer, is responsible for enforcing any claims. Practice shows that the most effective solution is to put in place clear procedures for reporting and documenting any damage or malfunction of equipment.

It is worth emphasizing the role of regular inventories and inspections of entrusted equipment. This allows you to monitor the technical condition on an ongoing basis and respond quickly to any problems that arise. It is also good practice to keep detailed records of donated equipment, including its specifications and usage history.

Who is responsible for data protection in body leasing?

In the context of data protection in the body leasing model, there is a complex liability structure. The providing company, as the controller of the employee’s personal data, is responsible for processing the employee’s data to the extent arising from the employment relationship. This includes, among other things, persoel and payroll data, information on qualifications or employment history.

The benefiting company, on the other hand, becomes the data controller to the extent necessary to organize work and implement projects. This means being responsible for the secure processing of employee data in its IT systems, controlling access to resources, and ensuring compliance with the requirements of the RODO in daily business practice.

It is particularly important to precisely define the scope and purpose of personal data processing by both parties. The agreement should clearly define what data is transferred between the companies, for what purpose and on what legal basis. Practice shows that the best solution is to minimize the scope of transferred data to the necessary minimum required for the effective implementation of cooperation.

In day-to-day practice, it is also crucial that the employee is properly trained in the data protection issues applicable to both organizations. The employee should be aware of his or her duties and responsibilities in this regard, both to the sharing and using company.

How is liability for breach of confidentiality regulated?

Protecting confidential information in body leasing requires a comprehensive approach due to the tripartite nature of the cooperation. The sharing company is responsible for ensuring that the employee is bound by appropriate confidentiality obligations, which include both information relating to the leasing company itself and potential customers.

The benefiting company, in turn, should precisely define the scope of confidential information and put in place appropriate procedures to protect it. In practice, this means clearly communicating to the employee which information is confidential, and providing appropriate tools and procedures to safeguard this data.

Liability for breach of confidentiality can be enforced at several levels. Toward the employee, there can be employee liability (by the sharing company) and liability based on obligations to the using company. Practice shows that the most effective are precisely defined contractual penalties that can be charged in the event of a proven breach of confidentiality.

It is also crucial to put in place effective mechanisms to monitor and control compliance with confidentiality obligations. Regular reminders of obligations in this regard and information security training are good practice.

Who is responsible for damages caused by a seconded employee?

Liability for damage caused by an employee in a body leasing model is an area that requires particularly precise regulation. The providing company, as the formal employer, is liable for damages caused by the employee to third parties under the terms of the Civil Code. This includes damages caused by both intentional and unintentional fault.

In business practice, a model has developed in which the benefiting company can claim compensation from the providing company for damage caused by the delegated employee. The key, however, is to prove a causal link between the employee’s actions and the resulting damage, and to show that the damage was caused by the performance of the delegated tasks.

The safest solution is adequate liability insurance, covering damages caused by seconded employees. Increasingly, sharing companies are offering such insurance as a standard part of their services, providing additional security for all parties to the cooperation.

It is also important to put in place procedures for documenting and reporting any incidents that may result in damage. Prompt response and proper documentation of the circumstances of the incident significantly facilitates subsequent determination of liability and potential claims.

What responsibility does the employee have to the two companies?

An employee in a body leasing model is in a special legal position, being liable simultaneously to two entities. With respect to the providing company, the employee bears the classic labor liability under the Labor Code, which includes taking care of the welfare of the workplace, keeping confidential information confidential and observing basic labor obligations.

To the benefiting company, the employee is responsible for the proper performance of assigned tasks, adherence to internal regulations and procedures, and protection of entrusted property. This responsibility is factual in nature and results from actual organizational subordination. In practice, this means the need to adapt to the organizational culture of the benefiting company and comply with its labor standards.

A particularly important aspect is responsibility for entrusted information and data. The employee must exercise the utmost diligence in protecting the secrets of both companies, which often requires conscious separation of information and compliance with different confidentiality regimes. Practice shows that the best solution is to train the employee in detail on the rules and regulations that apply to him.

In the context of material liability, it is crucial to precisely define the scope of an employee’s responsibility for the entrusted property of both companies. It is good practice to draw up detailed protocols for the transfer of equipment and tools and to update these documents regularly.

The issue of copyright in body leasing requires particularly precise regulation due to the complexity of the relationship between the parties. Normally, the copyright in works created by an employee in the performance of his duties is vested in the employer, which in this case is the sharing company. However, the peculiarities of body leasing require additional regulations to ensure the transfer of these rights to the benefiting company.

In business practice, a model has developed in which the sharing company, under appropriate contractual provisions, undertakes to assign the copyright in the works created by the delegated employee to the benefiting company. It is crucial to precisely define the scope of this assignment, covering all fields of exploitation relevant from the perspective of the beneficiary company’s business.

It is also important to regulate the issue of so-called subsidiary rights, i.e. the right to modify and develop works created by an employee. In an IT environment, where source code is constantly developed and modified by different teams, this is of particular importance. It is good practice to put in place mechanisms to ensure that the benefiting company has full freedom to modify and develop the works received.

It is also worth noting the issue of remuneration for the transfer of copyrights. In most cases it is assumed that it is included in the standard remuneration for body leasing services, but for legal certainty it is worth regulating this explicitly in the contract.

Who is responsible for substitution in the absence of a seconded employee?

The responsibility for providing replacements in case of employee absence is one of the key aspects of cooperation in the body leasing model. The providing company, as the entity responsible for ensuring continuity of service provision, should have developed procedures for replacements. In practice, this means maintaining a pool of specialists who can take over the duties of an absent employee.

The process for arranging replacements should be precisely described in the body leasing contract, including deadlines for reporting absences, procedures for introducing replacements, and requirements for the competency of replacements. It is particularly important to specify in which cases the beneficiary company can refuse to accept a proposed replacement due to insufficient qualifications.

It is good practice to have a system of project documentation and knowledge transfer procedures in place to facilitate rapid implementation of the replacement. In an IT environment, it is particularly important to properly manage source code, technical documentation and access to systems so that the replacement can continue work effectively.

It is also worth paying attention to the financial aspect of replacements. The contract should clearly specify whether and to what extent the beneficiary company bears the additional costs of arranging replacements, especially in the case of long-term absences.

How is liability shaped in the event of a violation of a non-compete?

Non-compete in body leasing requires a comprehensive approach that takes into account the interests of all parties. It is standard for a sharing company to enter into a non-compete agreement with an employee to protect its interests as an employer. However, in practice, it is equally important to safeguard the interests of the benefiting company, which often provides the employee with confidential business information and know-how.

In this context, it is crucial to put in place mechanisms to effectively enforce the non-compete. Practice shows that the most effective solution is a combination of obligations of the employee to both companies, supported by appropriate contractual penalties. It is also important to precisely define the geographical and temporal scope of the non-compete.

Liability for non-compete violations can be enforced both under labor law (by the providing company) and under additional contractual obligations to the benefiting company. It is good practice to put in place mechanisms for monitoring potential violations and procedures for rapid response in the event of their discovery.

It is also particularly important to regulate the compensation of the employee for compliance with the non-compete after the termination of cooperation. In practice, a model is often used in which the cost of this compensation is shared between the sharing company and the benefiting company, which allows for a fair distribution of the financial burden.

What contractual penalties can be applied in a body leasing contract?

The system of contractual penalties in body leasing should be structured in a way that strikes a balance between effectively protecting the interests of the parties and preserving the flexibility necessary in a dynamic business environment. The primary area of application of contractual penalties is violations concerning the quality of services provided. The beneficiary company may reserve penalties for failure to provide an employee with the agreed competence or for significant deviations from the declared level of service provision.

Another important category is penalties related to violations of confidentiality and data protection obligations. In this case, the amount of penalties should be proportional to the potential damage that could result from the disclosure of protected information. Practice shows that an effective solution is to introduce a progressive scale of penalties, depending on the severity of the violation and the potential consequences for the company.

In the context of liability for premature termination, contractual penalties should take into account the actual costs and losses incurred by the other party. This is especially true when the benefiting company has to suddenly change service providers or when the providing company loses the ability to provide services due to the customer’s actions. It is important that the amount of penalties be reasonable and not lead to an undue burden on either party.

An important element of the system of contractual penalties is also the introduction of clear procedures for their calculation and possible challenge. It is good practice to specify a mediation or arbitration process in case of disputes over the legitimacy of the penalty, thus avoiding lengthy litigation.

What is the liability in case of premature termination?

Early termination of cooperation in the body leasing model requires a precise definition of responsibilities and consequences for all parties involved. As a standard, the contract should specify the permissible reasons for early termination of cooperation and the procedures involved. It is particularly important to distinguish between termination of cooperation for reasons attributable to the employee and termination resulting from the business decisions of either company.

When the beneficiary company is the initiator of the termination, it is crucial to define notice periods and possible financial obligations. Business practice shows that the most effective solution is to introduce differentiated notice periods depending on the seniority of the employee and his role in the project. Longer notice periods for key specialists allow better planning of the handover process.

Financial responsibility in case of premature termination of cooperation should take into account the real costs incurred by both parties. The sharing company may bear the cost of having to find a new project for an employee, while the benefiting company must face the cost of acquiring and implementing a new specialist. It is good practice to have compensation mechanisms in place to distribute these burdens fairly.

The issue of protecting the continuity of projects in case of premature termination of cooperation requires special attention. The contract should include provisions for the process of transfer of knowledge, documentation and tasks, so as to minimize the negative impact of the change on ongoing projects. The introduction of a formal exit interview process and documentation of the transfer of responsibilities works well in practice.

Summary

Body leasing, as a complex form of business cooperation, requires a precise definition of the responsibilities of all parties involved. It is crucial to understand that an effective cooperation model is based on a balance between the formal legal requirements and the practical aspects of day-to-day cooperation.

Market experience shows that success in body leasing depends on several key factors. First, precisely defining the responsibilities of each party in the contract. Second, putting in place effective mechanisms for communication and resolving potential conflicts. Third, a flexible approach to changing business needs while maintaining a stable legal framework for cooperation.

It is worth emphasizing that liability in body leasing should not be seen as a limitation, but as a tool for building long-term, effective business relationships. Proper understanding and management of liability allows you to maximize the benefits of this form of cooperation while minimizing potential risks.

In a dynamically changing business environment, especially in the IT sector, it is crucial to regularly review and update the responsibility arrangements adopted. This makes it possible to adapt the cooperation model to the changing requirements of the market and ensure optimal conditions for the business development of all parties involved.

How ARDURA Consulting supports staff augmentation

Flexible IT team scaling is key to delivering projects on time and within budget. ARDURA Consulting, with a network of over 500 senior IT specialists and 211+ completed projects, provides experts ready to start within 2 weeks — with 99% retention rate and 40% cost savings compared to traditional hiring.

Need support? Contact us — we’ll help you find the right specialists for your needs.